The private company that owns and operates Baton Rouge’s red light camera monitoring system was censured in North Carolina for operating without an engineering license. The firm also isn’t licensed in Louisiana. 

That's raised concerns for several East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council members who are slated to vote on a four-year contract extension with the firm at its Nov. 26 meeting. 

American Traffic Solutions — which locally operates 24 red light cameras across 16 intersections — was reprimanded by North Carolina’s engineering board in November 2018 for violating state law by installing red light cameras without acquiring a state-mandated engineering license.

Louisiana Revised Statute 37:681 also requires firms practicing engineering to be licensed “in order to safeguard life, health and property, and to promote the public welfare.” Neither American Traffic Solutions nor its subsidiary Verra Mobility are licensed with Louisiana’s Professional Engineering and Land Surveying Board, according to a database maintained by the state agency.

American Traffic Solutions did not return repeated requests for comment, however, Mark Armstrong, a spokesman with the Mayor-President’s Office, said the firm assured the city-parish that it was in compliance with state law.

“If (Louisiana’s engineering board) comes back and rules on this particular case that they need to be certified, then we expect them to be certified,” Armstrong said. “We don’t expect that to have any effect on the cameras that have been up for 10 years.”

It isn't immediately clear whether the lack of a license would give drivers who received tickets an opportunity to challenge them.

The Arizona-based vendor first began operating in East Baton Rouge Parish in 2007 when then-Mayor-President Kip Holden championed the installation of a half-dozen of the red light cameras across the city. The firm was not licensed in Louisiana.

The professional service agreement signed at the time states that American Traffic Solutions will “provide installation drawings stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the State of Louisiana.” It makes no mention of the firm's license. It’s unclear if the city-parish vetted American Traffic Solutions for its licensing credentials before signing the agreement.

For comparison, when contractors fill out request for qualification forms to work for the state’s Department of Transportation and Development, they are required to provide their firm license number as registered with Louisiana's engineering board.

Donna Sentell, the executive director of Louisiana’s engineering board, said she couldn’t comment on the specifics of this case but likened the importance of engineering licenses to that of medical licenses.

“It’s the same thing as a doctor being licensed to treat a sick person for an illness or a disease,” Sentell said. “Engineers provide services in which the public could be harmed. You want to ensure competency.”

A firm license is an “added layer of protection for the public” that the company is in good standing with the state and has a qualified supervising professional, Sentell added.

The Advocate requested copies of the engineer-approved installation plans for the red light cameras at each of the 16 intersections. The Parish Attorney's Office, however, was only able to produce documentation for cameras at five intersections.

Top stories in Baton Rouge in your inbox

Twice daily we'll send you the day's biggest headlines. Sign up today.

Those plans — all from 2008 — include a signed and certified engineering seal from Robert B. Zaitooni and list him as an employee of American Traffic Solutions. State records show Zaitooni, who could not be reached for comment, is licensed with Louisiana’s engineering board. However, American Traffic Solutions is not.

When used on a set of plans or documents, an engineering seal serves as a signal to regulators and the public that the work meets the standards of a qualified professional engineer who is ethically obligated to safeguard the health and welfare of the public.

Neither the city-parish nor American Traffic Solutions could provide the certified engineering plans for the remaining intersections, though Armstrong said signed and sealed plans were provided to the city-parish before any installations occurred.

In Wilmington, North Carolina, American Traffic Solutions installed red light cameras at 13 intersections without obtaining a state engineering license. Additionally, 12 of the installation plans lacked signed engineering seals, according to reporting by the Port City Daily.

After an investigation, North Carolina’s Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors determined Wilmington’s red light cameras qualified as a form of engineering and placed American Traffic Solutions on notice for practicing engineering without being properly licensed.

Separately, North Carolina’s engineering board fined Robert F. Rennebaum, an engineer American Traffic Solutions hired to retroactively affix his engineer seal on red light camera plans in Greenville. Rennebaum had no role in supervising the engineering plans and did not work for American Traffic Solutions.

North Carolina’s engineering board determined Rennebaum had “aided or abetted" an attempt to evade state law and ordered him in May to pay $5,000 and to take remedial engineering ethics courses.

American Traffic Solutions’ lack of license has raised a number of questions among Metro Council members.

Councilman Chandler Loupe said he wondered whether it could have “blowback” with regard to the city-parish’s ongoing red light camera litigation. That lawsuit, filed in the 19th Judicial District Court in December, challenges whether American Traffic Solutions is authorized to issue citations under the parish’s home rule charter.

Councilman Matt Watson questioned whether the firm’s lack of license could make the film captured by the cameras inadmissible in court. The updated contract would allow ATS to replace the existing cameras with more up-to-date equipment that would allow police officers to monitor live feeds at the forthcoming Real Time Crime Center.

“If these cameras are tied to the Real Time Crime Center, and it turns out the firm didn’t have an engineering license, how would that affect the usage of the film as evidence? What if the film shows a murder?” Watson said.

Councilwoman Chauna Banks said the firm’s lack of license alone doesn’t bother her. However, she said she does think the city-parish needs to determine whether the firm does indeed need a license before a contract is signed.

Daryl Gissel, the city-parish’s chief administrative officer, emphasized the importance of the red light cameras to public safety. He said placing a police officer at certain busy intersections — like College Drive and Interstate 10 — would backup traffic and be a safety hazard for law enforcement.

“If you get rid of red light cameras, there’s no other way to do any type of enforcement in those intersections,” Gissel said. “If you put a cop there trying to stop people running that red light, you’d shut down the entire city.”

The red light camera program has generated significant revenue for the city-parish: $3 million annually from 2016 to 2018 and $3.5 million in 2019. The 2020 budget projects $2.205 million in revenue from the program. 


Email Blake Paterson at bpaterson@theadvocate.com and follow him on Twitter @blakepater