state capital exxonmobil refinery_0002.jpg

The ExxonMobil Refinery in Baton Rouge, with the state Capitol in the foreground.

A state board that oversees billions of dollars in property tax breaks for manufacturers is considering taking another step toward giving more power to local officials. 

The Board of Commerce and Industry, which is largely appointed by the governor, is slated to consider a motion Wednesday that would put the decision about the Industrial Tax Exemption Program property tax abatements back into the hands of the local entities levying taxes.

Right now, the police jury or parish council, local school board and the sheriff's office must decide whether to approve local tax breaks in exchange for jobs and capital investment in the communities which they reside. 

There will likely be some clarifying questions by board members during the meeting about the specifics of the proposed motion means, but in general, it's gotten a positive response. 

"This has been too cumbersome of a process. I'm happy to make this process flow better if there are changes to be made. I don't see where the board will have any opposition to that," said Heather Malone, board member and economic development director in Vidalia near Alexandria. "I am interested in hearing from LED which issues warranted the motion. I am a supporter of locals having a voice."

The motion was drafted by the Louisiana Economic Development department, which is responsible for the administration of the tax incentive program, which is popular among petrochemical plants and food processing facilities across the state. 

The proposal would amend the ITEP rules to address projects that make changes after being approved. 

Potential changes include the number of jobs created at a project site or jobs retained. Any amendments to jobs, payroll or "compliance terms or conditions" are applicable no earlier than the project year the board approves the amendment. Meanwhile, if there is an amendment approved by local entities at two different rates the "most demanding term" would apply. 

Top stories in Baton Rouge in your inbox

Twice daily we'll send you the day's biggest headlines. Sign up today.

For example, if a sheriff's office approves an amendment for a business requiring five jobs and $250,000 in payroll, but the police jury or parish council members approve an amendment requiring 10 jobs and $500,000 in payroll, the larger requirement sticks, according to the motion. 

"I do have a few questions of staff, but it's kind of self-explanatory to streamline the process and involving locals more. That's a good thing," said Guy McInnis, board member and St. Bernard Parish president. "If that's what it's going to accomplish, I'm planning on voting yes.

"I've always been of the belief that LED staff should get a heads up from the locals in the beginning of the process if they are dead set against the exemption before they do a whole lot of work. LED staff does a great job and they spend a lot of time on these ITEP requests. Getting local input as soon as possible in the process will always be a good thing, whether it's for changes or the original ITEP."

On the flip side, local taxing entities would not be allowed to make side deals and change the definition of jobs or change the duration or property tax split — with the exception of a "mega project," which could be offered up to a 93% property tax exemption. 

Typically, the exemption is 80% of property taxes for five years and up to 10 years total, so the company would pay 20% of its local property tax bill. 

"I see no problem in requiring the local government to approve (amendments)," said Travis Holley, board member and attorney by trade, "but I think there needs to be an education process to really understand (ITEP)." 

Likewise, LED would be responsible for notifying local taxing entities and the tax assessor when jobs or payroll requirements in a contract are not met by a business with an ITEP agreement. 

"Various consultants and companies have asked LED staff about the process for petitioning the board for amendments to Exhibit A’s (ITEP agreements)," Joe Coussan, public information officer at LED, said in a recent email. "Anticipating that more formal and specific requests may be made in the future, LED staff drafted the motion for the board’s consideration of a streamlined and consistent process."

Email Kristen Mosbrucker at